[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":25},["ShallowReactive",2],{"zoom:p5ch13z2:en":3},{"period":4,"chapter":15,"zoom":18},{"id":5,"title":6,"titleEn":6,"titleEs":7,"coverArtworkId":8,"range":9,"rangeEn":9,"rangeEs":9,"cover":10},"p5","High Middle Ages","Plena Edad Media","hannibal-alpes","987 → 1453",{"fileName":11,"filePageUrl":12,"imageUrl":13,"sourceLabel":14},"Facade-notre-dame-paris-ciel-bleu.JPG","https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Facade-notre-dame-paris-ciel-bleu.JPG","/assets/p5-moyen-age-classique-cover.png","Wikimedia Commons",{"id":16,"title":17},"p5ch13","Philip V the Tall: Stabilizing the Kingdom After the Crisis (1316–1322)",{"id":19,"title":20,"chapterId":16,"html":21,"hasEn":22,"isFallback":23,"seoDescription":24},"p5ch13z2","Succession: The \"Principle of Masculinity\" Hardens","\u003Cp>The crisis of 1316 forces the kingdom to decide: how to transmit the crown when there is no longer a direct male heir? The solution adopted strongly favors succession through men.\u003C/p>\n\u003Chr>\n\u003Ch2>🏛️ A Crown, Not a Fief\u003C/h2>\n\u003Cp>The idea takes hold that the crown is a matter of public order: it is not divided and is not transmitted like ordinary land. The goal is to avoid conflicts between pretenders.\u003C/p>\n\u003Chr>\n\u003Ch2>👑 1317: A Proclamation That Excludes Joan\u003C/h2>\n\u003Cp>After the death of John I, \u003Cstrong>Joan\u003C/strong> (daughter of Louis X) is supported by part of her Burgundian relatives. But her legitimacy is questioned, and Philip presents her as a direct obstacle to his accession.\u003C/p>\n\u003Cp>On February 2, \u003Cstrong>1317\u003C/strong>, an assembly gathered in Paris proclaims Philip as better placed than Joan and affirms that “woman does not inherit the kingdom of France.”\u003C/p>\n\u003Chr>\n\u003Ch2>📌 “Salic Law”: A Retrospective Legend\u003C/h2>\n\u003Cp>Contrary to a widespread belief, the “Salic law” is not evoked in the debates of 1317. The reference to the Salic Franks is a later construction, subsequently used to “officialize” a practice of excluding women.\u003C/p>\n\u003Chr>\n\u003Ch2>👑 An Exclusion That Sets Precedent\u003C/h2>\n\u003Cp>Excluding certain female claims is not merely a choice of the moment: it manufactures a rule. In the 14th century, this logic will be reused and justified retrospectively, until becoming a central element of the monarchical tradition.\u003C/p>\n\u003Chr>\n\u003Ch2>🧠 Key Points to Remember\u003C/h2>\n\u003Cul>\n\u003Cli>1316 accelerates a clarification: continuity of the kingdom before individual rights.\u003C/li>\n\u003Cli>Succession through men becomes a political solution, then a norm.\u003C/li>\n\u003C/ul>\n",true,false,"The crisis of 1316 forces the kingdom to decide: how to transmit the crown when there is no longer a direct male heir? The solution adopted strongly favors",1778543134713]