[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":22},["ShallowReactive",2],{"zoom:p6ch2z18-1355-1356-tensions-with-the-dauphin-and-the-rouen-affair:es":3},{"period":4,"chapter":12,"zoom":15},{"id":5,"title":6,"titleEn":7,"titleEs":6,"range":8,"rangeEn":8,"rangeEs":8,"covers":9},"p6","La Guerra de los Cien Años","The Hundred Years' War","1328 → 1461",[10],{"filename":11,"url":11},"COMTE_Pierre-Charles_Sacre_de_Charles_VII_Huile_sur_toile.jpg",{"id":13,"title":14},"p6ch2","John II the Good: Captivity, Internal Crisis, and the Treaty of Brétigny (1350–1364)",{"id":16,"title":17,"chapterId":13,"html":18,"hasEn":19,"isFallback":20,"seoDescription":21},"p6ch2z18","1355–1356: Tensions with the Dauphin and the Rouen Affair","\u003Cp>On the eve of Poitiers, France is threatened not only from without: it is traversed by internal rivalries. The Navarrese crisis rebounds, confidence collapses, and John II chooses a spectacular display of force.\u003C/p>\n\u003Chr>\n\u003Ch2>🧭 Dauphin, Empire, and Political Suspicion\u003C/h2>\n\u003Cp>The Dauphin \u003Cstrong>Charles\u003C/strong> is caught in complex diplomatic balances: the Empire, Burgundy, and the Dauphiné form a space where alliances and rivalries intersect. In this context, propaganda and intrigue play an important role: the Navarrese camp seeks to oppose son to father and isolate the king.\u003C/p>\n\u003Cp>To calm concerns, John II grants the Dauphin a great apanage and responsibilities, but distrust remains.\u003C/p>\n\u003Chr>\n\u003Ch2>🏰 April 5, 1356: Rouen, Arrest of Charles the Bad\u003C/h2>\n\u003Cp>On \u003Cstrong>April 5, 1356\u003C/strong>, during a gathering of nobles at \u003Cstrong>Rouen\u003C/strong>, John II appears armed and has \u003Cstrong>Charles II of Navarre\u003C/strong> arrested. The intervention is staged as an act of sovereign authority: neutralizing a prince perceived as dangerous, accused of plots and held responsible for an ongoing political crisis.\u003C/p>\n\u003Cp>In the process, \u003Cstrong>John V of Harcourt\u003C/strong> and several companions are arrested and executed. The gesture is deliberately exemplary, but it shocks: in Normandy, it is perceived as a violation of the balance and commitments, and it radicalizes loyalties.\u003C/p>\n\u003Chr>\n\u003Ch2>💥 Consequences: Normandy Ignites, War Accelerates\u003C/h2>\n\u003Cp>The Rouen affair triggers a cascade:\u003C/p>\n\u003Cul>\n\u003Cli>scandal among part of Norman nobility;\u003C/li>\n\u003Cli>the rise of the king of Navarre’s popularity in networks hostile to the king;\u003C/li>\n\u003Cli>resumption of raids and alliance shifts.\u003C/li>\n\u003C/ul>\n\u003Cp>In \u003Cstrong>June–July 1356\u003C/strong>, offensives chain together, and the Black Prince’s raid from Guyenne leads directly to the \u003Cstrong>Poitiers\u003C/strong> confrontation.\u003C/p>\n\u003Chr>\n\u003Ch2>🧠 To Remember\u003C/h2>\n\u003Cul>\n\u003Cli>The Navarrese crisis becomes an open crisis of authority.\u003C/li>\n\u003Cli>Rouen (April 1356) accelerates the polarization of camps.\u003C/li>\n\u003Cli>Internal spiral and resumption of raids converge toward Poitiers.\u003C/li>\n\u003C/ul>\n",true,false,"On the eve of Poitiers, France is threatened not only from without: it is traversed by internal rivalries. The Navarrese crisis rebounds, confidence collapses,",1782343353533]