The Bronze Age and the Dawn of Iron · PREHISTORY
Discovered in 1893 at Saint-Yrieix, near Angoulême, the Vénat hoard ranks among the richest assemblages ever uncovered from the Atlantic Late Bronze Age. Beyond its scale, already noted in the main chapter, this hoard of 2,721 pieces deserves closer attention — for the diversity of its contents, its place among other major contemporary deposits, and the puzzle its burial still poses today.
The Vénat hoard is no mere pile of metal: it breaks down into several major categories of objects. Weapons sit alongside tools — socketed axes, flanged or appendage axes, hatchets, saws, gouges, chisels, razors, hammers, and sickles — while personal ornaments form an equally rich assemblage: tweezers, pins, fibulae, clasps, belt elements, buttons, pendants, bracelets, beads, rings, and earrings. Added to these are harness and chariot fittings — rings, appliques, phalerae, belt plaques, fixing sheets, chariot elements — a few more unusual objects such as spheroids or a roasting spit, and finally purely metallurgical remains: ingots, foundry waste, rivets, and various debris. This assemblage is characteristic of hoards belonging to the so-called “carp-tongue sword” group, a well-recognized type-fossil of the Atlantic Late Bronze Age, which places Vénat within the recent phase of that period known as the “Vénat horizon” — even though its precise dating remains a matter of debate among specialists.
Compared with other major contemporary assemblages, Vénat stands out clearly. The Larnaud hoard, in the Jura, held around 1,800 bronze objects at the time of its discovery, weighing 66 kilograms, buried around 950 BCE for likely ritual or symbolic reasons — a practice widespread at the end of the Bronze Age. Yet its composition is almost the reverse of Vénat’s: most of Larnaud’s pieces were of continental, local manufacture, made between 1000 and 950 BCE, with only a minority coming from Atlantic-coast workshops. Vénat, by contrast, owes its distinctiveness to its markedly more Atlantic orientation, with about 30% of its objects imported from regions as distant as Great Britain and Portugal. Across the entire French Atlantic assemblage, a little over 15,000 metal remains from the Late Bronze Age have been catalogued to date — a total that places the Vénat hoard alone among the most significant assemblages of this corpus.
As with Larnaud, the burial of such a mass of metal wealth — often deliberately broken or incomplete before being deposited — raises a question research has never definitively settled. Was it a ritual offering, meant to be permanently withdrawn from the world of the living? A stock of raw material set aside by a smith or itinerant craftsman who never returned to retrieve it? Or a symbolic act of setting aside prestige goods, perhaps during a political or social crisis? None of these hypotheses stands alone, and specialists today tend to favor a reading that combines several such motivations depending on the deposit in question.