Uxellodunum, a Site Lost Then Found

---

The main chapter places, in section III, the siege of Uxellodunum at Puy d’Issolud, in the Lot. This identification, now considered established, is nonetheless the result of a scholarly debate nearly two centuries old — a textbook case of how a major ancient site can remain literally untraceable, despite as detailed an account as Caesar’s.

---

🔍 A site erased from collective memory

Unlike Alesia or Gergovia, whose locations are barely disputed today, that of Uxellodunum faded from local memory over the centuries. The ancient name itself disappears from medieval and modern sources, leaving scholars to reconstruct its location from the topographical clues alone provided by Caesar’s account: a stronghold with steep slopes, surrounded by a watercourse, fed by a spring gushing at its foot.

---

⚔️ A debate among several candidates

Several sites in the Quercy region successively claim this identification. The Champollion brothers — one of whom, Jean-François, would become the decipherer of Egyptian hieroglyphs — propose in the 19th century the site of Capdenac, a hypothesis that would keep supporters for a long time. Other competing locations, such as Luzech or Murcens, are also put forward at various times, each relying on its own reading of Caesar’s text and on partial archaeological clues.

---

🏛️ An official identification, but not a final one

It is only after excavations conducted in the 1990s and 2000s, led by Jean-Pierre Girault, that converging evidence — notably around the Loulié spring, matching the tapped spring described by Caesar — allows the Ministry of Culture to officially validate, on 26 April 2001, the identification of Puy d’Issolud as the site of Uxellodunum. This decision, backed by recognized specialists such as Christian Goudineau, does not entirely close the controversy, however: supporters of competing hypotheses continue today to contest this conclusion, arguing that other sites better match certain details of the ancient text.

---

🧠 Key points

• Unlike Alesia or Gergovia, the location of Uxellodunum remained uncertain and debated for nearly two centuries.
• Several sites in the Quercy region were successively proposed, including Capdenac (championed notably by the Champollion brothers), Luzech, and Murcens.
• It was only in 2001, after excavations led by Jean-Pierre Girault around the Loulié spring, that the Ministry of Culture officially validated Puy d’Issolud.
• This official identification has not entirely settled the debate, with some researchers continuing to defend competing locations.