1516: The Concordat of Bologna and Religious Policy

The Concordat of Bologna, signed on 18 August 1516 between Francis I and Pope Leo X, replaced the Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges and gave the king of France greater control over the Gallican Church.

---

🤝 Background and Negotiations

Since 1438, the Church of France had lived under the regime of the Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges, which guaranteed it broad autonomy from Rome — a text Louis XII had taken care to renew, but which did not prevent recurring conflicts between the king and the papacy over the sensitive matter of ecclesiastical appointments. Francis I, buoyed by the still-fresh prestige of Marignano, intended to use his meeting with Pope Leo X to secure what his predecessors had never fully managed to obtain: control over appointments within the Church of his kingdom.

The negotiations took place at Bologna, where the pope and the king met in the aftermath of the French victory in Italy, and stretched over several months. On the French side, it was Chancellor Antoine Duprat who led the discussions; on the papal side, Cardinal Lorenzo Pucci. The two camps did not share the same priorities — Francis wanted control over appointments, Leo X wanted the abrogation of the Pragmatic Sanction and the return of formal papal authority — but, as we shall see, these two objectives were not incompatible: they would even combine into a compromise that satisfied, at least on paper, both parties.

---

📜 The Main Provisions

The concordat, signed on 18 August 1516, rested on a fairly simple principle of exchange: the king would henceforth propose candidates for bishoprics and major abbeys, the pope merely confirming them, while reserving certain major benefices for himself and recovering the payment of annates — that first year’s revenue from benefices which, under the Pragmatic Sanction, had largely escaped Rome. The droits de régale, which allowed the king to collect the revenues of vacant bishoprics, were meanwhile retained.

In exchange for these substantial advantages for the crown, the Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges was purely and simply abrogated, “for the good of peace and the unity of the Church,” in the consecrated formula — an abrogation that did not fail to provoke the discontent of the Gallican clergy, attached to the autonomy this text had guaranteed them for nearly eighty years. The Concordat of Bologna thus resembles less a victory for either camp than a pragmatic compromise: the king gained considerable political and financial control over the Church of his kingdom, the pope regained formal authority, and Gallican traditions emerged from it noticeably weakened.

---

⚖️ Reactions and Opposition

The compromise went down badly among those who stood to lose the most. The Gallican clergy denounced an assault on its privileges and its autonomy; the Parlement of Paris, traditional guardian of Gallican liberties, simply refused to register the text until 1518, and several provincial parlements followed suit; the University of Paris, for its part, multiplied petitions to the king and the pope in defence of what it considered its academic liberties. It would take two years of resistance and negotiation before the Parlement of Paris finally consented to register the concordat, not without reservations, and before the opposition gradually died down, unable to overturn a text the king was absolutely determined to enforce.

---

📜 Application and Evolution

Once the resistance of the early years had been overcome, Francis I made full use of the prerogatives the concordat offered him: he appointed to bishoprics men chosen for their loyalty, their competence, or their social origin, placed members of his own family in certain sees, but also supported, in the spirit of the age, several humanist bishops. This policy of appointments, far from remaining a mere parenthesis of the reign, durably structured relations between the crown and the Church of France: his successors, beginning with Henry II, inherited it and made use of it in turn, and the text remained in force — including during the Wars of Religion, when it became an instrument of control over the clergy — until the Civil Constitution of the Clergy, in 1790, put an end to it.

That, in the end, is the true importance of the Concordat of Bologna: far beyond its immediate religious stakes, it gave the French monarchy a lever of power over one of the richest and most influential institutions in the kingdom, and, through this centralisation of appointments, foreshadowed the more authoritarian forms of government the following centuries would develop — not without leaving, in its wake, Gallican tensions that would never entirely die out.

---

🧠 Key Takeaways

• 18 August 1516: signing of the Concordat of Bologna between Francis I and Leo X
• Negotiators: Antoine Duprat for France, Cardinal Lorenzo Pucci for the papacy
• Principle: the king proposes bishops, the pope confirms them; abrogation of the Pragmatic Sanction of Bourges
• Resistance: the Parlement of Paris refused to register the text until 1518
• A compromise that gave the crown durable control over the Church of France, in force until the Revolution

---

Next zoom: The imperial election of 1519 and the rivalry with Charles V.